The Morality of the Markets & Anglo Moral Nihilism

May 7, 2013
lebow-nihilists

“Anglo moral nihilism” is a type of nihilist that just thinks morals are tough, leave it to the experts, “I’m not paid to do that.”  It’s atheistic, but indifferent, but also focused on angels and demons, God and the Devil.  But it’s also mostly just nihilist consumer who thinks the morals are in the Bible which is the word of God himself.  There, now that morals have been purchased, let’s move on to politics.

How can people lead the nation who don’t even appreciate nature?

“Trees cause more pollution than automobiles do.” – Ronald Reagan, 1981

read more

Why is the Sun masculine and the Earth feminine?

November 13, 2012
eclipse

Hello, my name is Carl Rittenhouse Larson, but that’s just a name that was given to me, I’ve been dissolving my ego lately, and it’s either gone or I can’t tell it’s there.  A person’s name is part of the ego.  I am the universe.  The universe is Carl.

Why should you listen to me?

Today is November 13, my birthday, it is the new moon, it is a supermoon (meaning that the moon is at perigee, the absolute closest it gets to Earth) and there is an eclipse of the Sun streaking across the south Pacific all day.  My birthday only.  My Sun sign is Scorpio, which is powerful, and my Moon sign is Aries, which is philosophical and of the mind.  Together, they are focused, and today, as truly as the tides swell and contort, these attributes are me, now.

In the below podcast, Santos Bonacci explains why astrology is important, and how Aries is philosophical and of the mind, as I say above (so I’m not just making this up!).  ”Aris is at the top of the head, in the cerebrum…It is the higher mind…Israel is in your head, and it is hiding in the word cerebrum…Scorpio is the generative area.”  In this way, both Scorpio and Aries are of the nature of one.  In this way, I am one, like the total eclipse searing across the Earth’s mega-ocean today.

Podcast: Santos Bonacci on Red Ice Radio 9-9-2012

My only memories of pre-reincarnation are disembodied consciousness.  I feel that my past lives are non-bodily, and my future lives will be as well.  I am temporarily assuming human form for this life only.  This is why people tell me I have a “young” soul, because it’s my first round trip as a human, ideally my last.

Spiritual entrapment is impossible (on the longest time scale), just like water entrapment (on the longest time scale) is impossible, or any kind of energy, or repeating signal.

I have been in control of my body for a long time.  Since I was a young child, I’ve held on.  As I would dream as a kid, I’d control myself and I’d kill any entity that was aggressive towards my stream of consciousness, any subconscious demon which attempted a coup of consciousness was simply killed by me, with brutal efficiency; I’m the dictator of my own mind.  I’ll invite other consciousnesses out of my subconscious to come sit next to me as I govern my body, but only I am allowed to drive.  I use my subconscious as an advisor, but I am in charge, and this has been the case my whole life, even through my psychonautic journeys and adventures.

Peculiar how Pluto, Mars, Venus, Earth, and Jupiter are in alignment.

Get stuck in a reincarnation rut, and that’s like a water molecule being kept in a lake for ten thousand years… don’t worry, you’ll be released eventually, your life energy can’t be killed any more than water can be cut with a knife.

Frequency governs astrology and the ability of a disembodied consciousness to enter a planetary system, and subsequently, the mind of a being.  I have tuned into Earth like a radio station, and I live here for this life.  In this way, astrology is the key-lock combination which connects human consciousness to disembodied astral consciousness.

The myth of linearity:

What a funny idea.  A line, with two end points. We don’t see this in nature – lines are a creation of humans.  We make our cities, roads, buildings, rooms, money, our entire material lives, out of rectangles – lines. Lines and squares imprison – think instead in terms of triangles, and surface area.

Time is about cycles and rhythms, time is of course measured linearly by clocks, but clocks don’t create time.  We are time. You are time, I am time; if I don’t control my time, I don’t control myself; if we don’t have our time, we are not.  Even spacial lines, extended long enough, connect back in a circle – rigorous academic physics confirms this.  In this way, there is only frequency, never a linearity; lines are creations of humanity, of the material world.  Lines don’t exist in the natural or non-human world.  Even the horizon on the ocean fades to a perfect circle on the highest perspective, and then to a dimensionless point, and then to nothingness.

Positive and negative space

Positive is the will, negative is the free.  Together they are the sacred union.  For example, the Sun is positive space, it exerts positivity, whatever it’s exerting, it’s positively existing.  The Earth is negative, it is functionally defined by its negative space, such as the microscopic pores in soil which allow plants’ roots to take hold, which allow us to hide and escape the Sun’s rays for a moment and take shade; the Earth does have positive aspects as well like all femininity, but the Earth has these negative (not pejoratively negative, but precisely in the way I’ve defined positive and negative here only) aspects in a way that the Sun does not.  To be masculine, you must be 100% masculine; to be feminine, you must be less than 100% masculine.  This is the nature of positive and negative.  Between the positive and negative there is contrast, the contrast is the border, contrast defines reality.  Reality is contrast.

Universal to all cultures in all times is that the Sun is considered to be masculine, and the Earth feminine.  The Sun is the positive archetype there.  It is pure 100% positive existence.  The Earth is defined by its negative space, the pores and cracks in the soil where seeds find shade and shelter to mature and grow.  Earth is at her least fertile when she is all positive space – parched deserts, where the sand, and any brave but doomed seeds are baked during the day, and frozen at night.  What’s necessary is the positive and negative, this is the sacred union of all life.

Free will comes in this polarity, positive and negative.  It works for gender, electricity, magnets, space, it works for just about everything.  It’s a very universally applicable thinking tool.  But what lately fascinates me to no end is the introduction of a third to these polarities of two.  How would this even be possible?  What would the geometry look like?  Computing power is proportionate to the surface area of the material, not the volume.  This is true for laptops and brains.  So since the surface seems to be closer to the root of consciousness than volume, any surface area would have to be tiled with triangles.  Hexagons can fully tile a surface, but these are just groups of triangles.  Squares can tile a surface, but they, too break down to triangles – right triangles to be specific.  Thinking in terms of polar atoms could be less useful than thinking in terms of triangled surfaces.

It is true that we channel free will.  If we intend to be the originator of free will, then we are doomed.  We must always be channeling it, always seeking the absolute maximization of present and future free will, regardless of who enjoys it.  In this way, we do not create the free will we experience, but it flows through us, and while it is within us in the present moment, we do control it, very much like a special prism, scattering light, but also malleable.

Furthermore, the words being used to communicate in this present writer/reader moment, these words themselves don’t feel as if they’re being written by me, (materially, they are being typed by myself) but they come from a place outside me.  Clearly, this is a mental gateway into which I need to explore, but I’m sure it goes endlessly, so I’m enjoying the present moment of being, rather than long-distance thought-spelunking (which I’m sure I’ll do in not long).  I consider my words to be a very real manifestation of my self, but I also know my words come from a place outside myself.  If this seems like a contradiction, it’s only because the concept of a self is flawed, and based in ego, it is the product of our specific world, it’s not universal, it bores me, it is the dead part of the fingernail, and it is not me.  Truly, I have dissolved my ego, there are still remnants, but I swear to you, my material self, my ego, these are concepts for me which are continuously dissolved, and I am left with a most selfless existence.

There are those who deny the existence of free will, and I call this belief determinism.

Our world comes with good, moral redundancy protection built right in, it’s called the human conscience, and it’s a very powerful thing – when it’s turned on.  The only way to turn off this force is through determinism.  Most humans forfeit their human power and free will to a higher being, based only on blind nationalism or religious zeal.  Certainly muscles, nerves, bones, these obey free will.  But obviously, a bone is not a human being, a human being is a human being, and we have the power to act on our own free will.  A human being is not a muscle or nerve.  “Obeying orders” when one has the power to object is a denial of one’s own free will, and concentrations of power into small numbers of individuals is the most dangerous process imaginable – because we lose this moral redundancy protection.  All it takes is one thought error in one or a few individuals, and poof – blinding evil is born.  When all humans realize their collective power to dissolve the ego and maximize free will, we will be safe.  For this, we only need the internet.  Each human already has the power, we just need to be made aware of our free will.

Even the human hand, alone, could replace so many tools we have.  The body part we call the hand is an extremely useful tool, yet we buy products so we don’t have to use our hands.  Judges have made rulings they themselves disagree with, based only on a weird interpretation of a law to which they blindly submit.  Judges have the free will to change this world, but they do not use it.

The internet must become a force of nature in our world.  It must be created as a layer in space filled with many trillions of microscopic robots, all orbiting the Earth, each tiny one containing all the information known to all, as a redundancy safeguard, and each tiny one also able to move, reposition, and bond to its mostly identical neighbors.  Together, I’m sure they could create signals strong enough to communicate with computers on the surface of the Earth.  Even if the Sun had an enormous solar flare, knocking out all computers within its reach, the micro-orbiters eclipsed by the Earth would be much more than necessary to repopulate and maintain the entire world’s internet.  In this way, the internet must become a naturally occurring part of our world.

When the moral redundancy protection of the awareness of free will is turned on, it’s like white blood cells on disease.  When individual humans deny their immense personal power, these white blood cells go grey with impotence.  Consider this a plea to the world to turn on your moral free will, judge the world around you, and act according to the maximization of free will.

Every human is obligated to judge what does and does not maximize free will, and every human is obligated to maximize free will.

Rather than asking you to look at advertisements on my blog, rather than asking for your money in any way, I’ll only direct you toward a just cause for donation.  Please, visit this site, and be prepared to donate a few of your hard earned dollars.  The church asks you to tithe 10%.  Tax collectors, swindlers, and bankers have taken far more.  Give abusive priests none of your money, give it to this organization:

Rolling Jubilee

To truly destroy something, one must ignore it.  Hate is such a gift to your enemy.  Being aware, but choosing to ignore something is how that something fades like a ghost.

Money is a target of my intentional ignorance here.  I believe that our world has abundance, and I know that money rests on a foundation of scarcity.  There are multiple cures to cancer, there are multiple ways to free energy, information should be open source and free (just like my entire philosophy), and of course, we must abolish property as anything except a tool which helps us understand whose job it is to clean out the car and whose job it is to mow the lawn.  The more quality things that are available for free, the better our world will be, and the more independent we will be from both money and the bankers which attempt to run the world.

I’m going to take this paragraph to prod you a bit and check to see if you have a pulse – how does the below video make you feel?  It’s all true, so…  pay close attention.


Moving right along:

The bankers who run the Pentagon predict that by the year 2050, 25% of the world’s energy will be renewable and clean for the environment.  This figure is absolutely unacceptable, and would result in global catastrophe. We must mobilize now to stop this. Join Bill McKibben’s tour to and add to the momentum at least by where you physically stand.

You think this country’s changed in the past 300 years?

Aaaaaaaahahahahahahehehe *inhale* hahahahahah – gimme a second

Can’t tell the difference?  That’s because people believe what their parents tell them to.  We don’t like to think for ourselves.  It’s scary, it’s uncomfortable, but it’s exactly what we need to do.  Facebook gives you the information you want, it’s candy.  Google feeds you a lot of candy information as well, but isn’t quite as bad.  Pythagoreanism.com is an attempt to balance that, Pythagoreanism is about giving out, for free, the information we all need. This is the steak and vegetables. Don’t let any go to waste, now.

And be careful – you crave what you’ve recently consumed.

For democracy, why do we have private votes?  Why are we forced into accepting that our votes should never be known?  As if it’s not obvious already?  We are forced into this opinion because it’s so incredibly dangerous if we made our votes public, it’s dangerous because we humans would be claiming back our control.  If we were all children in class, and we all had to quietly walk up to teacher and whisper to her our vote for class president, and we left it up to her to calculate and count everything, well, it doesn’t take long to figure out that it’s the teacher who’s in charge.  If the kids voice their votes out loud, everyone hears how everyone votes, so it’s impossible for anyone to get the count wrong.

When everyone’s vote is public, it’s impossible to hack an election.  Not with any technology.  Literally, you would watch your vote be changed after you voted, and you would know it was tampered with.  Every voter should be able to watch his or her own vote be counted and accepted into the total.  Transparency and public voting are the cornerstones of a powerful citizen government.  Ballot secrecy is the tool of dictatorship, reducing democracy to meaningless theater.

I believe that every city should have an immaculately clean public bath, where people can wash themselves and their laundry for free.  Maybe they’d have to bring their own soap, but clearly, this would result in a dignified and clean city.  I believe that every city has the capacity to grow its own food, and that food should be given away for free.  I believe that information, food, energy, hygiene, and many other things should be free in every way, and can easily be with present technology.  The more of everything which is available for free is the extent to which we have liberated ourselves from the control of bankers.  Literally: money is a form of brainwashing.

Paper means nothing.  If your life is about pushing paper, then I’m ever so sorry, but your life means nothing.  Clearly, I, too, am a paper pusher by day, but I do live as a being.  I haven’t let that living flame die out, it’s been burning since before I could remember as a kid, and I’m going to keep it burning.  They want us scared, believe me, that’s their goal, and it’s how they thrive.  I, for one, will die before they make me afraid.

See you in the afterlife.

Whatever.

Outbound links:

1. CAUTION: clicking this link will destroy the worldview of many readers. 

2. M.T. Keshe will change the world with his new technology, possibly overnight.  If his claims are true, then he is the greatest scientist the world has ever known.  Only patent law stands in his way.  What an uphill battle…

3. Rick Simpson has the cure to cancer, and he needs our support.  Sorry Monsanto, the cure for cancer is not economically profitable, so it’s suppressed.  It’s worth noting that Keshe (from link 2) also claims to have a cure for cancer, but link 3 goes to a man who can bring us this cure today.

My little moral / political theory

June 4, 2012
photo2

Pre-disclaimer: The disclaimer is pretty harsh, try not to be offended – if you’re reading my blog, odds are, I already think you’re the shit.

Disclaimer: If you’re the type of person that exclusively prefers powerpoints over “long blocks of text,” then shield yourself from the following spoonful of truth, you pitiful ignorant shitfuck.  If you’re the “literate” type, with a 6th grade or better English-language reading level (or of whatever language this has been translated into) and an attention span of at least 8-10 minutes (which would put you likely in the 90th percentile of at least all modern Americans), then first, thank you for holding onto some scrap of humanity in all this mess, and please, read on, enjoy, ponder, and contribute comments.  Welcome to my mind.

Our economic system conveniently, and perhaps accidentally, doubles as a moral laundering system.

We see this throughout history and across the world; it is the story of one or few human beings who will find moral justifications sufficient to enable themselves to obtain long term economic profit by the murder and rape of the innocent indigenous life of the planet Earth.

Chains = snake = linearity = single dimensionality = oppression

read more

The presidential primary is a joke

February 18, 2012

February 18, 2012

There’s no democracy in Maine this year.  Voters from Hancock and Washington counties have been reported (by Fox News, actually) as being “not counted.”  Some polling stations were closed, due to a phantom snowstorm that never materialized.  There’s an easy way around all of this – we just need to do it.

Maine in February of 2012 is a sad example of a large underlying problem, everywhere in America, and all through our history: in-person elections are inherently flawed, and we need to get our elections online.

Sure, there will be challenges, but those hurdles are going to be much easier to overcome than the catastrophic, corruptable, logistics nightmare of holding an in-person election.

I’m from Oregon, where it’s 100% vote by mail.  Maybe that makes me more predisposed to support a system where it evolves even further – vote by internet.  People should have a choice of how they vote.  Right now, few have any choice in how they vote.

read more

Uncensored Internet Access is a Human Right

February 8, 2012

Podcast

February 8, 2012

This election year, don’t vote for politics as usual.  Instead, let’s amend the constitution.

Amendment 28: Uncensored internet access is a human right.

read more

Transcending the "liberty versus security" debate

January 26, 2012

 

Audio MP3

January 26, 2011

Wherever the line between the right to privacy and security is drawn, it should apply equally to governments and citizens.

“The NYPD recently announced that it’s working on a mobile scanner designed to detect concealed weapons on people from up to 75 feet away.”  The obvious, age old question, is where to draw the line between liberty (or the right to privacy) and safety.  Ben Franklin weighed in on the side of liberty when he said,

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

But ultimately, this question is irrelevant, because the naturally occurring and increasingly rapid advance of technology literally outpaces the debate.  Instead of slogging through this murky philosophical swamp, why don’t we just fly right over?

Boxers, briefs, or 9mm?

read more

My debate with Senator Dianne Feinstein on PIPA & SOPA

January 19, 2012

After writing letters urging my elected officials to oppose PIPA & SOPA, I got a response from California’s Demopublicratican politician Dianne Feinstein.  Below is my response to her response.  Looks like we’ve got a debate brewing.  Fun!

read more

Top 2 reasons why SOPA & PIPA are dangerous

January 13, 2012

January 13, 2012

There are many reasons why SOPA & PIPA, (aka internet censorship) would hurt our world.  You could become a felon for streaming the wrong video!  Here are the two biggest and most dangerous reasons:

1.) An unelected government official will have absolute power in censoring the internet.  The USA will be China, on the internet.  Make no mistake, this power will be absolute.

2.) It preserves the lives of dying industries – industries which should go away, because they are weak.  Nature needs to be allowed to take its course.  The internet is a permanent change to society, and working against this change is a terrible, awful strategy.



read more

How to peacefully end Iran's nuclear enrichment program tomorrow

December 15, 2011

December 15, 2011

In September of this year, Nicholas Kristof sat down with Iran’s President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.  The interview has a startling excerpt:

N.K.: So I just want to make sure I understand the outline of that deal. If western countries provided 20 percent enriched fuel for the Tehran reactor, then Iran would stop all further enrichment. Is that correct?

M.A.: Yes, yes, we’ve said this before. We’ve said this many times. This is nothing new.

Nuclear technicians at work in Isfahan, Iran on March 30, 2005.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

read more

The Broken U.S. Presidential Primary System

November 29, 2011

November 28, 2011

“If we change the way politicians are elected, then we change the way they govern.” – Eliot Ackerman of Americans Elect

The majority of willing voters have been unable to participate in previous US presidential primary elections.  Politicians often drop out early, ending the race before the later-voting states count their votes.  No one doubts that having an earlier vote grants states huge influence, but the question is, why?  Why do we do it this way?   Why does Guam get to vote before California?  Why do the Virgin Islands go before New York state?  Why do we call this country a Democracy, and then use a flagrantly undemocratic system to elect our highest-ranking public official?

read more

How To Solve The Dilemma of the Iranian Nuclear Energy Program

November 12, 2011

November 12, 2011

In the past week, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) published a scathing report on Iran’s nuclear program, alleging that Iran has repeatedly lied, and that they are creating nuclear weapons as fast as possible.  Israel has hinted that a military attack on Iranian nuclear sites is possible by mid-December 2011, though Israel alone lacks the capability to significantly harm Iran’s nuclear program.  The US is arming the UAE, Iran’s most vocal critic in the Gulf.  Hamas and Hezbollah have indicated that any conflict would quickly become a regional war.

Western powers recently denied Palestine’s bid for membership to the UN – clearly, capitulation is not a strategy for either side, no matter the topic of discussion.

Iranian President Ahmadinejad, speaking at a ceremony at the Natanz nuclear facility.

read more

An Analysis of Wall Street's Response to #Occupiers

October 15, 2011

October 15, 2011

Wall Street has issued a formal response to the protesters.  A recent article from the WSJ, which is exemplary of Wall Street consensus opinion, argues condescendingly that the protesters fundamentally misunderstand the financial crisis, and have enthusiastically swallowed the lies of the current leftist government.  Nothing could be further from the truth.

A chilling caricature of Wall Street / Washington corruption and worship of profit

“Reckless government policies, not private greed, brought about the housing bubble and resulting financial crisis,” states the WSJ article.  This is blatantly wrong.  

Private greed was an integral part of the financial meltdown.  For example, loan officers at private banks knew they were issuing loans to borrowers who couldn’t pay it back, but they didn’t care, because the private banks were making a profit.  If that’s not private greed, I dont’ know what is.

The same can be said for everyone who participated in lending trillions of dollars to homebuyers who ultimately defaulted on those loans.  In trying to help more people own homes, the government did play a role  - but this role was heavily influenced by Wall Street lobbyists and corrupt politicians who have, as a result, cast a dark shadow of culpability on people for simply wanting to own their own home.

read more